The bullseye’s three sections represented the comfort, stretch, and danger zones. Participants compared their comfort level with specific activities, recognizing one person’s comfort zone might be another’s danger zone. The Leadership Lexington Program fosters individual and group growth, pushing class members out of their comfort zone and allowing them to stretch, without placing anyone in the danger zone. Leaders encouraged the class to assume positive intent when confronted with sensitive topics, but also to voice concerns before crossing into their own danger zones. After lunch, twelve class members presented pitches for community service projects. The presentations were characterized by the passion of their developers, a common desire to expand connections between individuals in the community, and a desire to eliminate the barriers preventing community members from full access to the wealth of opportunities in Lexington. Class members asked thoughtful questions and responded to all pitches with positive feedback. In the end, the Class of 2025 – 2026 chose four projects to support. Shane Burks II presented a proposal to pair at risk youth with mentors through the lens of golf. Alex Degen proposed a project encouraging closer collaboration between non-profits and the for-profit sector. TJ Maxberry designed a project to empower young people to build wealth and avoid generational poverty through financial literacy. Jay Phillips created a proposal to explore the use of a statutorily based land bank to acquire distressed property for community use.
On day two, Megan Holley-Slaughter, Owner and President of Sutherland & Associates, and Davonna Saier, Lead Associate, unveiled class members’ DiSC assessment results. The assessment sorted class members into four distinct leadership styles: Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness. Class members explored their own reports and shared from their results, which detailed leadership styles, priorities, motivators, and stressors with pinpoint accuracy. Holley-Slaughter and Saier also led a group-based exploration where members of each category compiled a list of their “dos and don’ts” for collaborating on group projects. Their skillful facilitation allowed class members with differing leadership styles to reach a better understanding of how to work with one another, using the strengths inherent to each style. Mindful of the needs of each team member, the class split into its first public service project planning session, a process made smoother by the new insights gained from the DiSC reports.
Comments are closed.
|